Subscribe

How to collaboratively write a blog post using Google Wave

12/07/2009 | By Richard Darell
How to collaboratively write a blog post using Google Wave
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Richard Darell: So, I invited my friend and colleague Fernando Fonseca (@fjfonseca) to try a new approach when writing articles for Bit Rebels. So far I have always written my articles by myself but I haven’t given topics and suggestions to other writers at Bit Rebels when time just haven’t been there for me. In an attempt to create a sense of a more lively climate at Bit Rebels I thought this could be a way to connect with some of the writers and get a feel the we almost were in an office together.

As all of our writers are scattered around the world this could surely be the solution we have been waiting for. Remember my article not so long ago “How Google is failing the launch of Google Wave” where I had almost counted out this potentially epic online tool for its lack of updates and fixes. After a a somewhat lively discussion outside the Bit Rebels forum I somewhat re-angled myself towards it. Not entirely though. I still think Google is doing it wrong by launching something that doesn’t properly work when it comes to server load. That’s my only concern right now and it sticks like thorn in my side that they don’t do anything about the lag that usually happens when you have been talking, working, waving or whatever term you want to use for you collaboration with others.

Fernando Fonseca: Quite interesting Richard :-) I think that the real problem with Google is that is not communicating properly what is going on. Actually this issue has been discussed with Google Wave’s team members that are participating in public waves and they agree: They have to communicate better regarding what is happening on the background when waves start to lag, get unsynced, can’t playback properly, etc.

Regular users actually see it as ironic that there is no Official Public Wave to keep wave’s users up to speed to what is happening at any given moment.

Having said that, this is a preview and what there is a problem with it: a huge problem. Remember when everyone was after invitations? Those times are gone. Early adopters are here but the third generation that got invited doesn’t understand Wave and don’t have the mind frame to be using a service that doesn’t work. So in order to test server side issues Google Wave had to send more invites to see if they can have the amount of active users they need to test the service. It’s quite ironic actually, don’t you think?

By the way, I can’t do this without music :-)

forewarned by PublicSpacesLab

Richard Darell: All very important points and I agree to some extent. However, when sending out the third batch of invites one could at least understand that there were people coming in to use the preview service that had no way of actually utilizing it in their work (which was somewhat what the service was for in the beginning. At least that’s what they said during their demoing). So, knowing that new users were coming in to try out the service wouldn’t they at least have created some sort of how, why and where kind of tutorial for these new souls?

This would potentially have spawned a lot more interest and more people would still want those invites and Google could have tried out their service with as many people as they had intended to with all the invites they sent out. Now there’s a lot of invites just laying around cause no one really wants to try it out because of that one fact. They don’t understand why they would ever need a service like this.

CollaborationBut, for Bit Rebels for example, who got a lot of invites and enough to get all our writers on board it is truly a great way to collaborate don’t you think? With a little bit of extra knowledge and a bit more information from the creators and the owners themselves I truly think this could be of huge interest for anyone. Anyone that is using email today and would like to heaven easier way to connect to people in real time instead of waiting for the very ineffective email reply to drop in to their inbox. So, what do you think Google and the devs could do to change this trend?

Fernando Fonseca: I love lists you know Richard? ;-)

  • Google Wave should communicate better: this is for me the major issue. Users need to know what is going on so that they can actually feel they are part of the development of all this and thus also build a strong community that is eager to help others.
  • They have to jump start what is being called “permission levels”: Some kind of control that allows any person that creates a Wave to be able to control what other users can and can’t do inside of a Wave. This is a major issue in public waves.
  • Also important, privacy: at this moment Google Wave contacts are connected to Gmail contacts: this means that someone just can go to any public wave, add all users to their contacts and they will be on his/hers Gmail contacts. See that “Requests” option on the Navigation tab: that should already be working.

In what comes to the specific use we could give to Wave on Bit Rebels, i can think of many ways:

  • Writers could insert on a Wave ideas for posts so that everyone on the team can know what the others are working on to avoid duplication.
  • Wave can be used to discuss topics of interest and editorial guidelines in a way that everyone is up to speed (by using the playback function)
  • Wave can also be used to share resources, tips, URLs, videos, etc. A creative pool of content… like the sound of it ;-)

Richard Darell: Yeah, for us it’s potentially a great tool. However, I am wondering if it is the email killer like most people call it. With the lag that Google Wave have right now I can’t even see it working as your everyday email inbox and conversation tool. I tried open a Wave that you and I had going on while talking about all things Bit Rebels not long ago and it crashed my FireFox over and over again before I could even check it. I can’t see this being a vital tool in my day to day work schedule. As FireFox IS the most used browser today I can’t imagine why they haven’t been on it like bees on honey already.

Fernando Fonseca: AH!!! Firefox is a pain for Google Wave. This is a fact and you are right: Google should take care of it. That is because of Google Chrome.

I just came up with an example:

Imagine that we want to write a post about what 2009 was for Bit Rebels.

You open a Wave and give the pitch. All writers are invited to the wave and they all start writing about it from their own perspective.

Richard Darell: A very interesting thought indeed. Yeah, the collaborative aspect of it is huge, no doubt about it. And another fact I want to point out is the heavy impact it will have on spelling and phrasing as everyone can go into each others “blocks” and make sure it’s said right. For us it’s a great deal of help as we write our articles quick and amusing as Bit Rebels is all about fun and facts.

Fernando Fonseca: I can only imagine all of us writing a team post about Twitter and Susan (@buzzedition) coming to the Wave on a later stage and kicking our collective A$$… because she is soooo good at it (Twitter I mean).

Richard Darell: True. So where do you think will happen next with Google Wave? What do you think they will address first and do you think they will change their strategy now when they know the community doesn’t really “feel” the use of Google Wave yet. Some may, just like us to some extent, but where and how do you think will apply changes and modifications to change this?

Fernando Fonseca: I think that we will be seeing, on the short run, significant changes on Google Wave. The acquisition of Etherpad is a huge step to bring a very mature technology into Wave and a step into the right direction in what comes to stability. This is huge. Also I would expect that permissions are going to be rolled out and more stability to the overall Wave experience are going to be implemented. As soon as this happens I think that those abandoned accounts and all the Invitation Waves that are still to be put to some use will start to be of use. I’m very optimistic even if I understand the obstacles that are ahead.

Richard Darell: That’s great! I hope Google Wave will find it’s way back into the spotlight again. Which brings me to the much interesting fact that we are actually writing this post in Google Wave collaboratively right now and it’s working just splendid, so far. However, with so much potential it’s hard to estimate the time people and other developers spend to actually add plugins for Google Wave and what could potentially make it much more simpler to use. For example, is there a plugin that enables you to just shoot a wave directly in to WordPress edit mode where you can add and remove further in your article? If not, someone should really hurry up and create such a vital part because I believe them implementations of Google Wave could potentially be huge when it comes to collaboratively write articles together. What’s your thoughts on this?

Fernando Fonseca: What i really would like to see was for Wave to be open so that what is happening right now could be seen by the whole world on a post at Bit Rebels in real time!! And where everyone, independently if they have a Wave account or not would be able to participate into this process with their thoughts and ideas. There are lots of plugins being developed at the sandbox that will allow for a extended implementation of Wave with the outside world.

Google Wave ExtensionsRichard Darell: What plugins/extensions are already out there for us Bloggers and Magazine owners and writers? Are there any already or is Google Wave still to young to have gotten them?

Fernando Fonseca: The most reliable is called embeddy (embeddy@appspot.com) that generates a code that anyone can insert right before the <body> tag of every post and enable to insert a wave in it. The trouble is … not everyone knows HTML to the extent of using it. So that anyone really is “anyone that has some HTML knowledge and is not afraid to mess with the HTML code of a page”.

As we have tried the Wordpress specific plugin “Wavr” is not working properly and it is frustrating because one doesn’t know if it doesn’t work because of the plugin or because the API services of Wave are under some kind of upgrade/fix/maintenance period.

Richard Darell: Yeah, an upgrade of that is totally one of the most important issues Google Wave have to look at right now.

So, how do you find the experience of writing a post/article in Google Wave and what could we do to further speed up the process and also make it more connected? Do you see a WordPress/Wave plugin coming that will enable you to easily click a button and the Wave article you just wrote with three other people will pop into the editor of your blog for last minute changes before being published?

Fernando Fonseca: I sure hope so and this is something that i will forward to some devs so they can think about it. I think that our role is also to demonstrate, in a balanced manner, that there are shortcomings to Google Wave but that there are also great things about it and this post is one of the examples. To write this by e-mail would take ages.. to say the least ;-)

Richard Darell: So true! To end up this collaborative article what do you think we should say to people that want to start writing collaboratively on their blog or magazine? Is there any suggestions and guidelines we could give them in order for the transcript to be easily read back and also easily manageable?

Fernando Fonseca: Let it flow would be my first advice, pick a topic and let all ideas flow. Then be aware of the structure that at this moment a Wave has: The smart thing to do is to write everything on a single Wavelet so that is easier to export… exactly what we didn’t do Richard. LOL

Richard Darell: I point my finger at you on that one Fernando. LOL :)

Fernando Fonseca: Mea culpa Mea Culpa #hangsheadinshame

More Articles By Richard Darell

Author: Richard Darell

Known as a leader in social media, Richard shares his extensive knowledge of cutting edge design with designers and developers all over the world. Richard founded Bit Rebels in 2009, and currently the site welcomes over one million visitors each month. Minervity.com, another one of Richard's very successful sites, is known as the go-to place for design tutorials and information on the latest techniques. Richard's creativity has also led him to a very long and successful career in music as a song writer and producer for International artists. Richard hails from Stockholm, Sweden but also spends time in Los Angeles. Follow Richard on Twitter: @Minervity


21 Comments

Random Surfer

December 7th, 2009

I guess this blog deserves a mention at Google Wave Blog.

[Reply]

Bob Hays

December 7th, 2009

But, I don’t want my blog posts to look like a conversation, I want them to look like an article….

And that’s where I’m having some difficulty seeing how to use Google Wave collaboratively; it seems like a wiki is much simpler, but has “locking” and change tracking issues (one reason Word is still used heavily IMHO).

Thanks! – Bob

[Reply]

Fernando Fonseca Reply:

Hey Bob,
I think that the answer is right there on the blog post: Pitch a theme, get the writers on the wave, let them expand their thoughts and then put it all neatly in the form of a article :-)

[Reply]

Bob Hays Reply:

But then the author does more work than if you just used a wiki. I still don’t see how Google Wave makes writing a collaborative article easier than using a wiki page. It makes managing the stream of conversations around the article easier (since they’re connected and in one virtual place) but not the actual writing; if everyone uses a wiki implementation with a discussion page (like MediaWiki) then I see no value in Google Wave for this at all.

Thanks! – Bob

[Reply]

Jon Marks Reply:

It’s far better than a wiki if a lot of people are working on the same paragraphs, sentences at the same time. Have a look at the playback on this collab-Google-Wave-Blog post if you’re bored:
http://jonontech.com/2009/10/23/a-collaborative-google-wave-blog-post/

Fernando Fonseca Reply:

Bob, all involved are the authors and then you have someone that makes the editing (the author).

Can you put other resources that are immediately available to everyone in a wiki? Like drag and drop a picture or a video or a PDF document that is immediately available within the same work space?

Also you need to learn how to edit a wiki, it might sound strange but I meet lots of people that don’t even know how to edit something at Wikipedia.

I am not a blind defender of Google Wave, there are several issues that I don’t like at all but there are positive things will be available to the regular user that until now where only available to those with more than just the “normal” knowledge.

Fernando Fonseca Reply:

https://wave.google.com/wave/?pli=1#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BCfwnNn1LA

Come on in ;-)

Bob Hays Reply:

Wikis are easy to teach (I worked at a really large bank and taught computer illiterates how to use wiki in a short time) – most mature wikis also allow import of media content easily. And there’s already sources for learning to use a wiki online today.

Seems to me that Google Wave is pretty obtuse and hard to learn to use well from what I’ve read and experienced so far.

Let me reflect how I think a document gets worked over in Google Wave – seems that a document gets formed and then people add comments in-line where they wish (this is the thing missing from wikis IMHO – you can synthesize it with something like Diigo but that adds complexity). Can they edit the document itself, and can someone retract the changes?

A system that allowed this (which is like comments in MS Word only much better) plus “soft edits” indicated a la MS Word (perhaps the one thing MS got right) and a way to collapse information into a draft would make Google Wave reasonable.

But I think those might make the already steep learning curve even greater.

And I’m not suggesting not using Google Wave, just trying to see where the sweet spot today is (I’m not sure I could entice bankers into using Google Wave today for example).

Bob Hays Reply:

Jon, do you have a video/sceen grab showing how the wave evolved over time, because all I see in the wave is a lot of conversation and I don’t see how the participants edited the document content directly.

Thanks!

Tom

December 7th, 2009

Yeah, this looks more like a chat than a blog post. Not interesting.

I think there is a place for GW in collaboration, but if I were running the wave, I’d moderate it, remove all the useless chatty s*** and consolidate the info as it appears (giving credit where due).

For a blog post, I’d keep one blip for the blog, and have collaborators either edit the blog directly or leave comment blips as necessary.

[Reply]

Bob Hays Reply:

So my question is: Is Google Wave an easier way to collaborate on blog posts than using a wiki for example (since its easy to install a wiki or to use one SaaS)?

[Reply]

Jon Marks Reply:

Sadly, no. The Google Wave Playback feature is meant to show you exactly this, but it seems really flaky. Not working for me at the moment. A few people have meta-blogged about the experience, though. Try these if you’re interested:

Ian: http://www.persuasivecontent.com/i-predict-a-cms-riot-1-hour-6-people-1-wave

Adriaan (CMS Watch): http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1724-Riding-Google-Wave

Philippe: http://contentedmanagement.net/blog/bove-the-contentious-waves-he-kept/

Let me know what you think.
Jon

[Reply]

Bob Hays Reply:

I think Philippe captures a lot of my current thoughts on the current Google Wave. I also think its interesting that eventually someone started writing, and then that people hesitated to edit – that’s a behavior I’ve seen w/ almost all collaboration tools.

Again, as for shared writing, I’m not sure real-time shared editing is useful – I agree that its cool to learn how people craft written thoughts, but I’d hate someone to over-write what I’m writing and not then be able to get that back. I think this would require restraint among the participants.

And that’s why I still think we’re light years behind MS Word’s tracking changes feature, and that feature is not interactive and very long in the tooth.

And I want to stress that I’m not against Google Wave, I don’t think its mature enough to be used by people that haven’t spent a fair bit of time getting into it.

Thanks! – Bob

Fernando Fonseca Reply:

@Tom A blog post is, by definition, what the author of that post wants it to be. You say chat and some others might say a transcript from a conversation, a interview, whatever.

When you say moderate you are surely referring to editing the content right? Since right now you can’t moderate a wave.

[Reply]

RG

December 7th, 2009

If a blog post results as an exchange of ideas or reports then yes. I think Wave could do that in a more structured way than email. Remembering that Wave is really meant to be ‘email if it were invented today’

The resulting article could be credited as ‘By Richard Darell with contributions by Fernando Fonseca’. The same way print articles are sometimes credited.

[Reply]

Jon Marks

December 7th, 2009

We gave this a try a while ago with 6 of us. One hour to decide a topic and write a blog post:

You can see the (now public) blog post here:
http://jonontech.com/2009/10/23/a-collaborative-google-wave-blog-post/

And there are lots of links to thoughts of the people that were involved.

Good fun!

[Reply]

Bob Hays

December 7th, 2009

And hey, why isn’t this discussion in a Wave? :-)

[Reply]

Fernando Fonseca Reply:

That can be arranged ;-) Send me your GWave addy via DM on twitter ;-)

[Reply]

Heidi Cool

December 7th, 2009

Nice example of using a Wave for collaboration. I’d not yet tried it with a specific blog post. I was recently invited as an author to a friend’s blog and we’re using it as a way to share procedures, our editorial policy, discussions, etc. The posts themselves will be made to Wordpress, where my friend will do the final editing/moderation.

In many ways, Wave reminds me of Pownce, the former Twitter competitor, in that one can have long threaded posts and also attach/embed media and documents. As you say though, it is still rather wobbly.

I think you touched on something very important regarding the latest batch of Wave users and how they need more documentation and tips. Usually when services are in beta the first users tend to be among the more tech savvy. They’re accustomed to poking around, figuring things out for themselves and dealing with things that don’t work. They don’t mind because they know they are beta-testing a product that is still under development, and that the reason they have access is to see what works and what breaks. Part of the mission for a beta-tester is to push the service to the limit to discern what fails.

Google Wave has been so much in the public eye, that many people who wouldn’t normally beta-test are also getting invites from friends. I think some of these folks may not fully understand that it’s not meant to all be working perfectly. Perhaps that is what Google needs to communicate, the role and expectations of beta-testers, so that they don’t go away disappointed by problems that will in fact be corrected at some future point.

[Reply]

Catarina Campos

December 7th, 2009

great post! this really shows a lot more than the actual contents: its shows the “spirit” of the gwave. That gives a live (and very lively) “sound” to the article, actually, because you can fell the real-time thingy there. One can almost ear the conversation, interview, exchange of thoughts, whatever you may want to call it (yes, wave, I know :D ).

You may want to think about inviting others blogs to wave with you, guys. :) Mashable, maybe? Oh, I don’t know if they can use it, unless it comes out of a press release ;)

[Reply]

Jesse Luna

December 13th, 2009

Great post, I’m glad you’ve stuck with Google Wave so far. Google Wave is just another tool right now that can be used for specific purposes. I think you did an effective job using it in this post.

I’ve been testing it out and it’s been mostly frustration. But, I can see it’s coolness and potential so I’m still banging on it and hoping Google works through the bugs and cludginess.

[Reply]

Leave a Reply

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Related Posts

Check out some more great tutorials and articles that you might like.